The effects of metro fare increase on transport equity: New evidence from Beijing
2019
- 207Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage207
- Abstract Views207
Article Description
Transit pricing is one of the major factors influencing transport-related equity. In particular, in developing countries with low car-dependency rates, public transit plays an important role in providing access for disadvantaged groups to desired destinations, such as jobs, education, and health care. Changes in public transit fares can significantly affect residents' travel expenditures and possibly transport-related social equity. However, cases from developed countries dominate the existing literature in the field, and the comparison of equity between flat fare and distance-based fare is scarce. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the case of Beijing. To relieve operators’ financial pressures, the Beijing municipal government replaced its flat metro fare (CNY 2) by a distance-based fare in 2014. Using retrospective survey data, this study analysed the effects of the metro fare increase on transport equity. An index of affordability was established to measure transit equity, and the multivariable models showed that the introduction of a distance-based fare would significantly increase the cost burden of vulnerable residents on metro use with such groups as low-income earners and young workers, who pay more than their counterparts. Because of the unaffordable housing price in Beijing and the different patterns of residence by income, this study also investigated the interaction effects of housing tenure and residential location. The compelling results suggest that residents who owned housing in the suburbs experienced less increase of the transit burden. These findings are interpreted as supporting the construction of affordable housing in suburban areas and integrated transit-oriented as tools to enhance social equity under the circumstance of property-led urban growth.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know