Toxicities, kinetics and degradation pathways investigation of ciprofloxacin degradation using iron-mediated H 2 O 2 based advanced oxidation processes
Process Safety and Environmental Protection, ISSN: 0957-5820, Vol: 117, Page: 473-482
2018
- 67Citations
- 3Usage
- 68Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations67
- Citation Indexes67
- 67
- CrossRef16
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
- Captures68
- Readers68
- 68
Article Description
Ciprofloxacin (CIP) is a widespread emerging water pollutant and thus its removal from aquatic environment is vital. The use of Fe 3+ /H 2 O 2 and Fe 2+ /H 2 O 2 resulted in 38 and 64% removal of CIP (8.0 ppm), respectively, within 80 min reaction time (pH 5.8, [H 2 O 2 ] 0 = 80 ppm, and [iron] 0 = 20 ppm). Low pH, high temperature, high dose of H 2 O 2 and Fe 2+, and low CIP concentration facilitated removal of CIP. The radical scavenger studies proved in situ generated OH to be involved primarily in the removal of CIP. The effect of temperature was used to estimate enthalpy and activation energies of the removal of CIP. At 800 min reaction time, the Fe 2+ /H 2 O 2 resulted in 54% mineralization of CIP using 16.0 ppm [CIP] 0, 320.0 ppm [H 2 O 2 ] 0, and 40.0 ppm [Fe 2+ ] 0. The potential degradation pathways of CIP established from the degradation of CIP by OH and products evolved was found to be initiated at C 6 through the loss of fluoride ion. The acute and chronic toxicities of CIP and its degradation products were estimated with the final product found to be non-toxic. The results suggest that Fe 2+ /H 2 O 2 -mediated AOPs have high potential for degradation as well as toxicity elimination of CIP and its degradation products.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582018301964; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.020; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047823281&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957582018301964; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0957582018301964?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0957582018301964?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://zuscholars.zu.ac.ae/works/3753; https://zuscholars.zu.ac.ae/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4752&context=works; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.020
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know