Variation in models for simple dynamic structure–soil–structure interaction problems
Procedia Engineering, ISSN: 1877-7058, Vol: 199, Page: 2306-2311
2017
- 5Citations
- 43Usage
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Usage43
- Downloads43
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
To account for dynamic cross-coupling of structures via the soil, a computational model must be accurate enough to provide the correct overall behaviour of the scattered wave field. However, simplicity is also important when a model should be used for design purposes, especially in the early design stages and feasibility studies. The paper addresses the accuracy of simple models in which an array of structures is simplified into blocks placed on the ground surface or embedded within the soil. Comparisons are made between models that account or do not account, in a proper manner, for the inertia and embedment of the structures. Especially, the limitations of simplified models are discussed regarding their capability to quantify the insertion loss accurately.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187770581733638X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.190; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029910726&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S187770581733638X; https://zuscholars.zu.ac.ae/works/3897; https://zuscholars.zu.ac.ae/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4896&context=works; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.190
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know