Exploring the Efficacy of ChatGPT in Adapting Reading Materials for Undergraduate Students
International Conference on Higher Education Advances, ISSN: 2603-5871, Page: 613-624
2024
- 2Usage
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures6
- Readers6
Conference Paper Description
Current research explores the efficiency of ChatGPT 3.5 in text adaptation for educational purposes. It aims to investigate reliability of the AI model for reading ease evaluation, its accuracy in reading manipulation on specific parameters, output quality, and prospects of improving user experience. The study considered text, sentence, and word length as the main features for measuring text difficulty. Flesch-Kincaid reading ease statistics was used for input and output text accessibility evaluation. The research identifies the areas of concern of using ChatGPT 3.5 for text manipulation and requirements for successful implementation of the AI model in the process of the reading materials transformation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200761547&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/head24.2024.17087; http://ocs.editorial.upv.es/index.php/HEAD/HEAd24/paper/view/17087; https://zuscholars.zu.ac.ae/works/6762; https://zuscholars.zu.ac.ae/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7799&context=works; https://dx.doi.org/10.4995/head24.2024.17087
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know