Nonpathological and pathological narcissism: which self-reported characteristics are most problematic in adolescents?

Citation data:

Journal of personality assessment, ISSN: 1532-7752, Vol: 96, Issue: 2, Page: 212-9

Publication Year:
2014
Usage 2345
Abstract Views 1686
Full Text Views 442
Link-outs 217
Captures 132
Exports-Saves 102
Readers 30
Citations 21
Citation Indexes 21
Repository URL:
https://aquila.usm.edu/fac_pubs/8027
PMID:
24007215
DOI:
10.1080/00223891.2013.830264
Author(s):
Barry, Christopher T.; Kauten, Rebecca L.
Publisher(s):
Informa UK Limited
Tags:
Psychology; Medicine; Environmental Science; Social and Behavioral Sciences
article description
Prior research indicates that dimensions of adolescent narcissism differ in their associations with indicators of positive and negative psychological functioning (e.g., Barry, Frick, Adler, & Grafeman, 2007 ; Barry & Wallace, 2010 ). This study investigated correlates of 2 empirically derived factors of adolescent narcissism (i.e., pathological and nonpathological narcissism) from 2 measures thought to differ based on their inclusion of pathological versus nonpathological content. In a sample of 188 at-risk adolescents ages 16 to 18, pathological narcissism was associated with various indicators of maladjustment, including aggression, low self-esteem, internalizing problems, and poor perceived interpersonal relationships. On the other hand, nonpathological narcissism was positively associated with self-esteem and aggression but negatively associated with internalizing problems. The implications for the conceptualization of adolescent narcissism are discussed.