Our Irrelevant Right to Health Care

Citation data:

Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol: 16, Issue: 2, Page: 5

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 193
Downloads 176
Abstract Views 17
Social Media 1
Tweets 1
Repository URL:
http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylpr/vol16/iss2/5
Author(s):
Baily, Mary Ann
Tags:
Law
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
From the advance publicity for Mortal Peril: Our Inalienable Right to Healthcare?, one might suppose the book would offer a closely reasoned argument for a market-based health care system with minimum government involvement and maximum deference to individual autonomy. While Epstein does advocate such a system, he fails to provide the reasoned argument. The book actually presents a collection of topics that seem to have been chosen because Epstein has strong views about them, not because taken together they yield a coherent view of health policy. To make matters worse, the discussion of each topic is a confusing mixture of broad generalizations, often unsupported by argument or data, and narrow analyses of specific laws, court cases, and regulations.