Fictive Kinship: Family reunification and the meaning of race and nation in American migration

Citation data:

Fictive Kinship: Family Reunification and the Meaning of Race and Nation in American Migration, Vol: 9781610448031, Page: 1-182

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 1864
Holdings 1408
Abstract Views 402
Link-outs 49
Full Text Views 5
Captures 74
Exports-Saves 40
Readers 34
Mentions 2
References 1
Reviews 1
Citations 18
Citation Indexes 18
Ratings
Amazon
Goodreads
Repository URL:
https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/faculty_books/205
ISBN:
9781610448123; 9780871544940; 9781610448031; 9780871548597
OCLC:
837922765; 949947536; 844727835; 995326453; 909969437; 929846629; 874838183; 901873992; 995313852; 867025367
Author(s):
Stone, Katherine V. W.; Arthurs, Harry W.
Publisher(s):
Russell Sage Foundation
Tags:
Social Sciences; Arts and Humanities; Labor contract; Labor market; Labor contract; Labor market
book description
Today, roughly 70 percent of all visas for legal immigration are reserved for family members of permanent residents or American citizens. Family reunification – policies that seek to preserve family unity during or following migration – is a central pillar of current immigration law, but it has existed in some form in American statutes since at least the mid-nineteenth century. In Fictive Kinship, sociologist Catherine Lee delves into the fascinating history of family reunification to examine how and why our conceptions of family have shaped immigration, the meaning of race, and the way we see ourselves as a country. Drawing from a rich set of archival sources, Fictive Kinship shows that even the most draconian anti-immigrant laws, such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, contained provisions for family unity, albeit for a limited class of immigrants. Arguments for uniting families separated by World War II and the Korean War also shaped immigration debates and the policies that led to the landmark 1965 Immigration Act. Lee argues that debating the contours of family offers a ready set of symbols and meanings to frame national identity and to define who counts as “one of us.” Talk about family, however, does not inevitably lead to more liberal immigration policies. Welfare reform in the 1990s, for example, placed limits on benefits for immigrant families, and recent debates over the children of undocumented immigrants fanned petitions to rescind birthright citizenship. Fictive Kinship shows that the centrality of family unity in the immigration discourse often limits the discussion about the goals, functions and roles of immigration and prevents a broader definition of American identity.