The Intelligibility of Extralegal State Action: A General Lesson for Debates on Public Emergencies and Legality

Citation data:

Legal Theory

Publication Year:
2010
Usage 292
Downloads 270
Abstract Views 22
Repository URL:
http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works/7
Author(s):
Tanguay-Renaud, Fran├žois
Tags:
jurisprudence; public law & legal theory; legal ethics--philosophy; social; political & legal philosophy; jurisprudence; public law & legal theory; legal ethics--philosophy; social, political & legal philosophy; Ethics and Political Philosophy; International Law; Jurisprudence; Legal Theory; National Security Law; Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration; Public Law and Legal Theory
article description
Some legal theorists deny that states can conceivably act extralegally in the sense of acting contrary to domestic law. This position finds its most robust articulation in the writings of Hans Kelsen and has more recently been taken up by David Dyzenhaus in the context of his work on emergencies and legality. This paper seeks to demystify their arguments and ultimately contend that we can intelligibly speak of the state as a legal wrongdoer or a legally unauthorized actor.