Contingency Enhancements in Attorney Fee Cases: City of Burlington v. Dague, the End of Merit Systems Protection Board's Struggle to Understand and Apply Delaware Valley II

Citation data:

Pepperdine Law Review, Vol: 20, Issue: 1, Page: 1

Publication Year:
2012
Usage 487
Downloads 477
Abstract Views 10
Repository URL:
https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/plr/vol20/iss1/1
Author(s):
Quinn, Cameron P.; Klos, Katharine A.
Tags:
Attorney; Attorney Fees; Billing; Civil Service Reform Act; Compensate; Conflict; Contingency Agreement; Contingency Enhancement; Contingency Fees; Counsel; Dague; Fee-Shifting; Hourly; Litigation; Lodestar; Market; Merit Systems Protection Board; Precedent; Represent; Risk; Supreme Court; United States; Courts; Law; Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility; Legal Profession; Legislation
article description
By Cameron P. Quinn and Katharine A. Klos, Published on 11/09/12