Big data - a 21st century science Maginot Line? No-boundary thinking: shifting from the big data paradigm.

Citation data:

BioData mining, ISSN: 1756-0381, Vol: 8, Issue: 1, Page: 7

Publication Year:
Usage 549
Abstract Views 262
Downloads 168
Full Text Views 106
Link-outs 13
Captures 67
Readers 39
Exports-Saves 28
Social Media 12
Tweets 11
Shares, Likes & Comments 1
Citations 4
Citation Indexes 4
Repository URL:;;;;
PMC4323225; 4323225
Huang, Xiuzhen; Jennings, Steven F.; Bruce, Barry; Buchan, Alison; Cai, Liming; Chen, Pengyin; Cramer, Carole L.; Guan, Weihua; Hilgert, Uwe K.K.; Jiang, Hongmei; Li, Zenglu; McClure, Gail; McMullen, Donald F.; Nanduri, Bindu; Perkins, Andy; Rekepalli, Bhanu; Salem, Saeed; Specker, Jennifer; Walker, Karl; Wunsch, Donald; Xiong, Donghai; Zhang, Shuzhong; Zhang, Yu; Zhao, Zhongming; Moore, Jason H. Show More Hide
Springer Nature; BioMed Central; DigitalCommons@URI
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Computer Science; Mathematics; Electrical and Computer Engineering; Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Whether your interests lie in scientific arenas, the corporate world, or in government, you have certainly heard the praises of big data: Big data will give you new insights, allow you to become more efficient, and/or will solve your problems. While big data has had some outstanding successes, many are now beginning to see that it is not the Silver Bullet that it has been touted to be. Here our main concern is the overall impact of big data; the current manifestation of big data is constructing a Maginot Line in science in the 21st century. Big data is not "lots of data" as a phenomena anymore; The big data paradigm is putting the spirit of the Maginot Line into lots of data. Big data overall is disconnecting researchers and science challenges. We propose No-Boundary Thinking (NBT), applying no-boundary thinking in problem defining to address science challenges.