Intermediality and Aesthetic Theory in Shklovsky's and Adorno's Thought

Citation data:

CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, ISSN: 1481-4374, Vol: 13, Issue: 3, Page: 4-null

Publication Year:
2011
Usage 4929
Abstract Views 2274
Full Text Views 1597
Downloads 1046
Link-outs 12
Captures 29
Exports-Saves 23
Readers 6
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
Repository URL:
https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol13/iss3/4
DOI:
10.7771/1481-4374.1791
Author(s):
Gelikman, Oleg
Publisher(s):
Purdue University (bepress); Purdue University Press
Tags:
Social Sciences; Arts and Humanities; Comparative Literature; Critical and Cultural Studies; culture theory, media studies
article description
In his article " Intermediality and Aesthetic Theory in Shklovsky's and Adorno's Thought" Oleg Gelikman places the concept of intermediality in the context of the unresolved conflict between philosophical aesthetics and aesthetic theory. The conflict originated in the response of an influential generation of thinkers to the crisis of the neo-Kantian schools and the emergence of modernism in the 1910s. Despite superficial similarities, aesthetic theory is neither a revamped aesthetics of the subject nor a theoretical vindication of modernism. By severing the connection between subject-object epistemology and theory of artworks, the practitioners of aesthetic theory such as Victor Shklovsky and Theodor W. Adorno transformed metaphysical aesthetics into a critical historiography of cultural production. Gelikman argues that, while incomplete, aesthetic theory can nonetheless be effective in analyzing the function of intermediality in the environment dominated by the resurgence of naturalistic and epistemological interpretation of the aesthetic. © Purdue University.