Usefulness of baseline lipids and C-reactive protein in women receiving menopausal hormone therapy as predictors of treatment-related coronary events.

Citation data:

The American journal of cardiology, ISSN: 0002-9149, Vol: 101, Issue: 11, Page: 1599-1605

Publication Year:
2008
Usage 571
Abstract Views 541
Downloads 28
Link-outs 2
Captures 42
Readers 27
Exports-Saves 15
Citations 45
Citation Indexes 45
Repository URL:
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/cardeza_foundation/14
PMID:
18489937
DOI:
10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.043
PMCID:
PMC3543778
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00000611
Author(s):
Bray, Paul F; Larson, Joseph C; Lacroix, Andrea Z; Manson, Joann; Limacher, Marian C; Rossouw, Jacques E; Lasser, Norman L; Lawson, William E; Stefanick, Marcia L; Langer, Robert D; Margolis, Karen L; Women's Health Initiative Investigators Show More Hide
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV; Excerpta Medica
Tags:
Medicine; Aged; Biological Markers; C-Reactive Protein; Coronary Disease; Estrogens; Conjugated (USP); Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lipids; Menopause; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Hematology
article description
Blood lipids and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) are altered by hormone therapy. The goal of the present study was to determine whether lipids and hs-CRP have predictive value for hormone therapy benefit or risk for coronary heart disease events in postmenopausal women without previous cardiovascular disease. A nested case-control study was performed in the Women's Health Initiative hormone trials. Baseline lipids and hs-CRP were obtained from 271 incident patients with coronary heart disease (cases) and 707 controls. In a combined trial analysis, favorable lipid status at baseline tended to predict better coronary heart disease outcomes when using conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). Women with a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio <2.5 had no increase in risk of coronary heart disease when using CEE with or without MPA (odds ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.06), whereas women with an LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio > or =2.5 had increased risk of coronary heart disease (odds ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 2.53, p for interaction = 0.02). Low hs-CRP added marginally to the value of LDL/HDL ratio <2.5 when predicting coronary heart disease benefit on hormone therapy. In conclusion, postmenopausal women with undesirable lipid levels had excess coronary heart disease risk when using CEE with or without MPA. However, women with favorable lipid levels, especially LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio <2.5, did not have increased risk of coronary heart disease with CEE with or without MPA irrespective of hs-CRP.