Objective Analysis of Impressed Chisel Toolmarks.

Citation data:

Journal of forensic sciences, ISSN: 1556-4029, Vol: 60, Issue: 6, Page: 1436-40

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 106
Abstract Views 36
Downloads 34
Full Text Views 21
Link-outs 15
Captures 7
Readers 5
Exports-Saves 2
Social Media 1
Tweets 1
Citations 2
Citation Indexes 2
Repository URL:
https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/mse_pubs/248
PMID:
26250933
DOI:
10.1111/1556-4029.12863
Author(s):
Spotts, Ryan; Chumbley, L. Scott
Publisher(s):
Wiley
Tags:
Medicine; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; forensic science; statistical comparison; chisel; impression; algorithm; toolmark
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Historical and recent challenges to the practice of comparative forensic examination have created a driving force for the formation of objective methods for toolmark identification. In this study, fifty sequentially manufactured chisels were used to create impression toolmarks in lead (500 toolmarks total). An algorithm previously used to statistically separate known matching and nonmatching striated screwdriver marks and quasi-striated plier marks was used to evaluate the chisel marks. Impression toolmarks, a more complex form of toolmark, pose a more difficult test for the algorithm that was originally designed for striated toolmarks. Results show in this instance that the algorithm can separate matching and nonmatching impression marks, providing further validation of the assumption that toolmarks are identifiably unique.