WHEN SHOULD RANDOM EFFECTS BE INCLUDED IN ESTIMABLE FUNCTIONS AND WHEN THEY SHOULD NOT?

Citation data:

Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture

Publication Year:
1992
Usage 67
Downloads 58
Abstract Views 9
Repository URL:
https://newprairiepress.org/agstatconference/1992/proceedings/18
DOI:
10.4148/2475-7772.1406
Author(s):
Blouin, David C.
Publisher(s):
New Prairie Press
Tags:
Agriculture; Applied Statistics
article description
In the mixed model, the behavior of linear functions of the fixed and random effects is examined. It is found that inclusion of certain functions of random effects can lead to estimators which are equivalent to those under a fixed effects model and are inconsistent with the inherent structure of the mixed model. Three examples are presented which illustrate the behavior of linear functions of the fixed and random effects. These functions represent the broad, narrow and intermediate inference spaces as introduced by McLean, Sanders and Stroup (1991). Which random effects should be included in the model is discussed. Random effects representing experimental error units are candidates for inclusion in estimable functions. Inclusion of experimental unit effects in estimable functions can lead to misleading results.