Implementing routine HIV testing: the role of state law.

Citation data:

PloS one, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 2, Issue: 10, Page: e1005

Publication Year:
2007
Usage 14169
Full Text Views 14104
Abstract Views 41
Downloads 11
Views 10
Link-outs 3
Captures 28
Readers 16
Exports-Saves 12
Mentions 1
References 1
Citations 29
Citation Indexes 29
Repository URL:
https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub/712; https://works.bepress.com/leslie_wolf/43
PMID:
17925853
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0001005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0001005.t001
PMCID:
PMC1994587; 1994587
Author(s):
Leslie E. Wolf; Alexis Donoghoe; Tim Lane; Beatriz Grinsztejn
Publisher(s):
Public Library of Science (PLoS); Figshare
Tags:
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Agricultural and Biological Sciences; Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Health Care; State Law; Computational Biology; Medicine; Information And Computing Sciences; disclosed; pretest; informed; hiv; Health Law and Policy; Law; Sexuality and the Law; State and Local Government Law
article media
article description
In September 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended routine HIV testing for all Americans aged 13-64, which would eliminate requirements for written consent and pretest counseling as previously required. However, this approach may conflict with state requirements concerning pretest counseling and informed consent for HIV testing. Our survey of state HIV testing laws demonstrates that the majority of states have HIV testing requirements that are inconsistent with the CDC's recommendations. Moreover, states that have recently amended their laws have not eased the requirements for pretest counseling and informed consent. The reasons for the persistence of these legal requirements must be understood to effect policy changes to increase HIV testing.