Using Quasi-Experimental Data To Develop Empirical Generalizations For Persuasive Advertising

Citation data:

Journal of Advertising Research, ISSN: 0021-8499, Vol: 49, Issue: 2, Page: 170-175

Publication Year:
Usage 6445
Full Text Views 3260
Abstract Views 2692
Downloads 430
Link-outs 63
Captures 427
Exports-Saves 396
Readers 31
Mentions 1
References 1
Citations 16
Citation Indexes 16
Repository URL:
Armstrong, J. Scott; Patnaik, Sandeep
WARC Limited
Social Sciences; Business, Management and Accounting
article description
This paper argues that “quasi-experimental data” provide a valid and relatively low-cost approach toward developing empirical generalizations (EGs). These data are obtained from studies in which some key variables have been controlled in the design. These EGs are described as normative statements, i.e., “evidence-based principles.” Using data from 240 pairs of print advertisements from five editions of the Which Ad Pulled Best series, the authors analyzed 56 of the advertising principles (listed) from Persuasive Advertising by J. Scott Armstrong (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming). These data controlled for target market, product, size of the advertisement, media, and in half the cases, for the brand. The advertisements differed, however, e.g. in illustrations, headlines, and text. The findings from the quasi-experimental analyses were consistent with field experiments for all seven principles where such comparisons were possible. Furthermore, for 26 principles they unanimously corroborated the available laboratory experiments as well as the meta-analyses for seven principles. In short, the quasi-experimental findings always agreed with experimental findings, even though the quasi-experimental analyses, and some of the experimental analyses, involved small samples, and often used different criteria. From an issue of JAR devoted to `empirical generalisations’: the papers were first presented at a conference at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania in December 2008.