Can security-enhancing interventions overcome psychological barriers to responsiveness in couple relationships?

Citation data:

Attachment & human development, ISSN: 1469-2988, Vol: 15, Issue: 3, Page: 246-60

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 1093
Abstract Views 733
Full Text Views 300
Link-outs 60
Captures 253
Exports-Saves 182
Readers 71
Social Media 2
Tweets 2
Citations 20
Citation Indexes 20
Repository URL:
https://researchbank.acu.edu.au/fhs_pub/1587; https://researchbank.acu.edu.au/fhs_pub/1493
PMID:
23560566
DOI:
10.1080/14616734.2013.782653
Author(s):
Mikulincer, Mario; Shaver, Phillip R; Sahdra, Baljinder K; Bar-On, Naama
Publisher(s):
Informa UK Limited; Routledge
Tags:
Psychology; Medicine
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Recent studies have shown that both dispositional and experimentally enhanced attachment security facilitate compassion and altruism. Here we report findings from a laboratory experiment, replicated in two countries (Israel and the United States), testing the hypotheses that (a) increased security (accomplished through subliminal priming) fosters caregiving behavior toward a romantic partner who discloses a personal problem, and (b) this increased security overcomes barriers to responsiveness induced by mental depletion. We gathered data on participants' attachment insecurities, randomly assigned them to one of four mental depletion (yes, no) and priming (security, neutral) conditions, and coded their behavior in an interaction with their romantic partner who was disclosing a personal problem. Dispositional attachment insecurities and manipulated mental depletion adversely affected caregiving, but security priming overrode the detrimental effects of both mental depletion and attachment insecurity in both Israel and the United States.