Corporate Security: Using Knowledge Construction to Define a Practising Body of Knowledge

Citation data:

Asian Journal of Criminology, ISSN: 1871-0131, Vol: 8, Issue: 2, Page: 89-101

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 555
Downloads 430
Abstract Views 104
Link-outs 21
Captures 12
Exports-Saves 7
Readers 5
Citations 9
Citation Indexes 9
Repository URL:
https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks2012/504; http://works.bepress.com/david_brooks/25
DOI:
10.1007/s11417-012-9135-1
Author(s):
David J. Brooks
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature
Tags:
Social Sciences; Information Security; Management Information Systems; Portfolio and Security Analysis
article description
Security is a multidimensional concept, with many meanings, practising domains, and heterogeneous occupations. Therefore, it is difficult to define security as a singular concept, although understanding may be achieved by its applied context in presenting a domicile body of knowledge. There have been studies that have presented a number of corporate security bodies of knowledge; however, there is still restricted consensus. From these past body of knowledge studies, and supported by multidimensional scaling knowledge mapping, a body of knowledge framework is put forward, integrating core and allied knowledge categories. The core knowledge categories include practise areas such as risk management, business continuity, personnel and physical security, and security technology. Nevertheless, corporate security also has interrelationships with criminology, facility management, safety, and law. Such a framework provides clear boundaries for the practising domain of corporate security, better reflects the security experts' view of their practising domain, allows directed tertiary pedagogy, and presents what could be considered the scholarly area of Security Science. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.