Multi-institutional comparison of simulated treatment delivery errors in ssIMRT, manually planned VMAT and autoplan-VMAT plans for nasopharyngeal radiotherapy.

Citation data:

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), ISSN: 1724-191X, Vol: 42, Page: 55-66

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 24
Abstract Views 23
Link-outs 1
Captures 9
Readers 9
Citations 3
Citation Indexes 3
Repository URL:
https://ro.uow.edu.au/eispapers1/923
PMID:
29173921
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.08.008
Author(s):
Pogson, Elise M; Aruguman, Sankar; Hansen, Christian R; Currie, Michael; Oborn, Bradley M; Blake, Samuel J; Juresic, Josip; Ochoa, Cesar; Yakobi, Jim; Haman, Alicia; Trtovac, Admir; Carolan, Martin G; Holloway, Lois C; Thwaites, David Show More Hide
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Medicine; Physics and Astronomy; Engineering; Science and Technology Studies
article description
To quantify the impact of simulated errors for nasopharynx radiotherapy across multiple institutions and planning techniques (auto-plan generated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (ap-VMAT), manually planned VMAT (mp-VMAT) and manually planned step and shoot Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (mp-ssIMRT)).