Dreaming: Ontological and Methodological Considerations

Citation data:

Page: 420-423

Publication Year:
2016
Usage 3
Abstract Views 3
Repository URL:
https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/2825
Author(s):
Kirchhoff, Michael D
Tags:
methodological; ontological; considerations; dreaming; Arts and Humanities; Law
article description
This commentary focuses on an ontological claim made by the authors of this target article: that perceiving, imagining and dreaming are inseparable. It explores how best to understand this "inseparability condition." It is shown that the evidence needed to justify a strict reading of the inseparability condition is lacking, while there is room for a more relaxed rendition of the inseparability condition. The inferred lesson is that in developing an enactive neurophenomenology of dreaming, it is a non-trivial task to achieve clarity about the ontology of dreaming, and its relationship to imagining as well as perceiving