Evaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard.

Citation data:

Journal of evolutionary biology, ISSN: 1420-9101, Vol: 22, Issue: 1, Page: 143-51

Publication Year:
2009
Usage 388
Abstract Views 354
Full Text Views 33
Link-outs 1
Captures 66
Readers 59
Exports-Saves 7
Citations 11
Citation Indexes 11
Repository URL:
https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers/3187
PMID:
19120815
DOI:
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01629.x
Author(s):
Olsson, Mats M; Uller, Tobias O; Warner, Daniel A; Shine, Richard; Radder, R S; Goodman, B A; Langkilde, T; Rohr, D H; Doughty, P; Bull, C M; Schwarzkopf, L; While, G M; Wapstra, Erik Show More Hide
Publisher(s):
Wiley-Blackwell
Tags:
Agricultural and Biological Sciences; Evaluation; offspring; size; number; invariants; species; lizard; Life Sciences; Physical Sciences and Mathematics; Social and Behavioral Sciences
article description
The optimal division of resources into offspring size vs. number is one of the classic problems in life-history evolution. Importantly, models that take into account the discrete nature of resource division at low clutch sizes suggest that the variance in offspring size should decline with increasing clutch size according to an invariant relationship. We tested this prediction in 12 species of lizard with small clutch sizes. Contrary to expectations, not all species showed a negative relationship between variance in offspring size and clutch size, and the pattern significantly deviated from quantitative predictions in five of the 12 species. We suggest that the main limitation of current size-number models for small clutch sizes is that they rely on assumptions of hierarchical allocation strategies with independence between allocation decisions. Indeed, selection may favour alternative mechanisms of reproductive allocation that avoid suboptimal allocation imposed by the indivisible fraction at low clutch sizes.