The educational situation in Utopia: why what is, is

Citation data:

Cultural Studies of Science Education, ISSN: 1871-1510, Vol: 10, Issue: 1, Page: 239-245

Publication Year:
Usage 1355
Abstract Views 1199
Full Text Views 83
Downloads 37
Link-outs 36
Captures 22
Exports-Saves 16
Readers 6
Repository URL:
Seaman, Jayson O.; Quay, John
Springer Nature; Springer
Social Sciences; John Dewey; Outdoor education; Curriculum theory
article description
In this response to Molly Ware’s review of our 2013 book, John Dewey and Education Outdoors, we extend her suggestion that complexity be regarded as an important, generative force in education reform. Drawing on Dewey’s 1933 Utopian Schools speech, we discuss the “level deeper” that Dewey sought as he criticized the method/subject mater dichotomy, which he saw as an artifact of social class carried forward in the form of a curricular debate rather than a natural source of tension that would be productive to democratic education. Dewey radically argued that learning itself contained similar anti-democratic potential. Eschewing the false child versus curriculum dichotomy, Dewey believed complexity as a catalyst for educational action would be achieved by engaging children in historically formed occupations, harnessing the forces that drive technological and cultural evolution in order to spur interest, effort, and the formation of social attitudes among students. Following Ware, we suggest that reformers should seek to understand at a lever deeper the many sources of complexity they encounter as they both challenge and honor what is.