Home-to-Work Conflict, Work Qualities, and Emotional Distress

Citation data:

Sociological Forum, ISSN: 0884-8971, Vol: 18, Issue: 1, Page: 137-164

Publication Year:
2003
Usage 1322
Abstract Views 730
Full Text Views 490
Link-outs 102
Captures 202
Exports-Saves 180
Readers 22
Citations 29
Citation Indexes 29
Repository URL:
https://scholars.unh.edu/soc_facpub/142
DOI:
10.1023/a:1022658929709
Author(s):
Scott Schieman; Debra Branch McBrier; Karen Van Gundy
Publisher(s):
Wiley-Blackwell; Springer
Tags:
Social Sciences; Family, Life Course, and Society; Place and Environment; Sociology
article description
Among a representative sample of employed men and women in Toronto, Canada, home-to-work conflict is associated positively with anxiety and depression. Two hypotheses propose work qualities as moderators. The double disadvantage hypothesis predicts that home-to-work conflict is more distressing when work is nonautonomous, routine, or noxious. The intrusion on job status/rewards hypothesis predicts that conflict is more distressing when work is autonomous, nonroutine, or nonnoxious. Results show that the association between home-to-work conflict and distress is stronger (1) among people in more autonomous jobs; (2) among women in routinized jobs; and (3) among men in noxious environments.