Sheppard V. Maxwell Revisted—Do the Traditional Rules Work for Nontraditional Media

Citation data:

71 Law and Contemporary Problems 171 (Autumn 2008), Vol: 71, Issue: 4, Page: 171-180

Publication Year:
2008
Usage 1522
Downloads 1403
Abstract Views 119
Repository URL:
https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol71/iss4/9; https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/sheppard_news_thesis/2
Author(s):
Hengstler, Gary A.
Publisher(s):
Duke University School of Law
Tags:
Sheppard v. Maxwell; Cleveland Press; Law
article description
This article appeared in The Court of Public Opinion: The Practice and Ethics of Trying Cases in the Media, an issue of Law and Contemporary Problems which examine the complicated, sometimes conflicting, constitutional, ethical, and practical considerations that can arise when a case draws the attention of the public and the media. Attorney and Professor Gary A. Hengstler grew up in a small town in Ohio and, as a boy of seven, can remember his family and friends being transfixed with the 1954 murder and trial. Here, Hengsler asks if the suggestions to control publicity that the Court made in Sheppard v. Maxwell are still effective, given the changes that have occurred in media.