Upstream Corporate Social Responsibility: The Evolution From Contract Responsibility to Full Producer Responsibility

Citation data:

Business and Society, ISSN: 1552-4205, Vol: 55, Issue: 4, Page: 491-527

Publication Year:
2016
Usage 818
Downloads 606
Abstract Views 162
Link-outs 50
Captures 84
Readers 55
Exports-Saves 29
Social Media 2
Tweets 2
Citations 13
Citation Indexes 13
Repository URL:
https://scholarship.richmond.edu/management-faculty-publications/39
DOI:
10.1177/0007650313500233
Author(s):
Schrempf-Stirling, Judith; Palazzo, Guido
Publisher(s):
SAGE Publications
Tags:
Business, Management and Accounting; Social Sciences; sweatshops; human rights; corporate social responsibility; sphere of influence; Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics; Leadership Studies; Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
The debate about the appropriate standards for upstream corporate social responsibility (CSR) of multinational corporations (MNCs) has been on the public and academic agenda for some three decades. The debate originally focused narrowly on “contract responsibility” of MNCs for monitoring of upstream contractors for “sweatshop” working conditions violating employee rights. The authors argue that the MNC upstream responsibility debate has shifted qualitatively over time to “full producer responsibility” involving an expansion from “contract responsibility” in three distinct dimensions. First, there is an expansion of scope from working conditions to human rights and social and environmental impacts broadly defined. Second, there is expansion in depth of this broader responsibility to the whole upstream supply chain without regard to contracting status. Upstream responsibility now includes all suppliers, including direct contractors and the chain of suppliers to such contractors. Finally, the change in CSR scope and depth has led to an evolution of CSR management practice.