Negative Anion Gaps
2022
- 515Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage515
- Views316
- Downloads199
Dataset Description
Supplementary file 1: Breakdown of the data sources in the study which are included in Supplemental files 2-9. Supplementary file 2: Data from 133 serum/plasma specimens from 116 unique patients (52 female, 64 male) that had a negative anion gap (-1 or lower). The retrospective timeframe is May 1, 2009 through August 18, 2021. Specific data fields include: unique patient identification number (deidentified), order description which generated the anion gap calculation, patient age in years at time of specimen collection, sex of patient as in the electronic medical record, [Na+] in mEq/L, [K+] in mEq/L, [Cl-] in mEq/L, [HCO3-] in mEq/L, calculated anion gap, identification of a recognized cause of low anion gap in the patient, comments on processes likely underlying the negative anion gap, classification of the electrolyte abnormalities that would result in a negative anion gap (low [Na+], high [HCO3-], and/or high [Cl-]), presence or absence of hypoalbuminemia (based on age-related r...
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know