Agronomy undergraduate students’ perceptions of ethics and animal welfare in relation to animal-based entertainment
Agronomia Mesoamericana, ISSN: 2215-3608, Vol: 35, Issue: 1
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Introduction. Undergraduate Agronomy students recognize the importance of animal production to satisfy the nutritional requirements of society; however, there is an epistemological gap regarding the use of animals in recreational activities. Objective. To explore the ethical and bioethical perceptions of students regarding animal welfare and the use of animals for entertainment purposes. Materials and methods. A survey was conducted among the population of active students at the ITCR Agronomy Engineering career during 2023, to evaluate the perceptions about animal welfare and the ethical use of animals in recreational activities. The application of the instrument allowed to describe the characteristics of the observed phenomenon in relation to the students’ perceptions of animal welfare. The data were analyzed using a t test to examine whether the means of two independent groups were significantly different from each other. Results. The level of concern for animal welfare in the student population was high (70.8%, n = 102; p<0.001). Furthermore, this concern is 4 times greater if the respondent was a woman compared to men (odds ratio 4.91, p<0.001). The students indicate that there is a gradation of animal suffering (56.7% n = 81, p<0.001) and the majority consider it to be unethical to perform entertainment activities using animals (73.6% n = 106, p<0.05). Conclusion. The students expressed support for animal welfare and recognized the ethical responsibility of humans towards them to avoid their unnecessary suffering. Their is suggested to incorporate multidisciplinary approaches in the curricula of Agronomy-adjacent degrees regarding human-animal relationship studies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85212943813&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/am.2024.58966; https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agromeso/article/view/58966; http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1659-13212024000100049&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1659-13212024000100049&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1659-13212024000100049; http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1659-13212024000100049; https://dx.doi.org/10.15517/am.2024.58966
Universidad de Costa Rica
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know