Evaluation of protein extraction methods for enhanced proteomic analysis of tomato leaves and roots
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, ISSN: 1678-2690, Vol: 87, Issue: 3, Page: 1853-1863
2015
- 15Citations
- 22,411Usage
- 150Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef3
- Usage22,411
- Full Text Views22,276
- 22,276
- Abstract Views135
- 135
- Captures150
- Readers150
- 150
Article Description
Proteomics is an outstanding area in science whose increasing application has advanced to distinct purposes. A crucial aspect to achieve a good proteome resolution is the establishment of a methodology that results in the best quality and wide range representation of total proteins. Another important aspect is that in many studies, limited amounts of tissue and total protein in the tissue to be studied are found, making difficult the analysis. In order to test different parameters, combinations using minimum amount of tissue with 4 protocols for protein extraction from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) leaves and roots were evaluated with special attention to their capacity for removing interferents and achieving suitable resolution in bidimensional gel electrophoresis, as well as satisfactory protein yield. Evaluation of the extraction protocols revealed large protein yield differences obtained for each one. TCA/acetone was shown to be the most efficient protocol, which allowed detection of 211 spots for leaves and 336 for roots using 500 μg of leaf protein and 800 μg of root protein per gel.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84942326919&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520150116; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312417; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652015000401853&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0001-37652015000401853&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652015000401853; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0001-37652015000401853; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520150116; https://www.scielo.br/j/aabc/a/ygV3LSXdy4wB7Jctddgc9tS/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know