Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of functional dentition among older people in Brazil
Cadernos de Saude Publica, ISSN: 1678-4464, Vol: 34, Issue: 10, Page: e00202017
2018
- 10Citations
- 867Usage
- 29Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The objective of this research was to evaluate trends in socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of functional dentition among community-dwell-ing older adults in Brazil. This was a cross-sectional study with data from the last two SBBrasil Project surveys conducted in 2003 and 2010. Functional dentition was defined as the presence of 20 or more natural teeth and was assessed during the clinical examination of dentition status. Schooling was used as the socioeconomic position measure. Socioeconomic inequality was measured using two complex measures; the slope index of inequality (SII) and the relative index of inequality (RII). The prevalence of functional dentition was 10.8% (95%CI: 8.1-14.2) in 2003 and 13.6% (95%CI: 11.1-16.5) in 2010. The prevalence of functional dentition increased significantly over the educational rank in both years. Absolute inequalities were significant for both years and remained unaltered between 2003 and 2010. Significant relative inequality in the prevalence of functional dentition was found in both years of the survey. Socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of functional dentition among older adults in Brazil persisted significantly between both national oral health surveys.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055075130&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00202017; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30329004; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2018001005003&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2018001005003&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2018001005003; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2018001005003; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2018001005003&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2018001005003&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2018001005003; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2018001005003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00202017; https://www.scielo.br/j/csp/a/pg4kc6YxVWGkMYQkkX6QJ6d/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know