Destruction of measurement scale through exploratory factor analysis in production and operations research
Gestao e Producao, ISSN: 1806-9649, Vol: 25, Issue: 2, Page: 384-397
2018
- 23Citations
- 1,749Usage
- 113Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper aims to assess the use of Exploratory Factor Analysis by Production and Operations researchers, discussing the adequacy of its application. We analyzed 97 papers published between 2010 and 2015 in the Production and Operations area -- of which 61 and 36 were published in international and Brazilian journals, respectively. These papers contain 140 different applications of Factor Analysis. The research shows that confirmatory techniques are prevalent in international papers, as well as exploratory techniques to evaluate the problem of common method bias. Conversely, the papers in Brazilian journals typically use the exploratory technique in more traditional ways, such as to confirm the unidimensionality of the construct, or still to generate scores for use in other statistical techniques. Despite the textbooks for the AFE teaching focus exclusively on the use of AFE in the exploratory mode (to identify the number and meaning of the common factors), this use has been less frequent in published articles, both national and international. Moreover, the research shows that the inappropriate use of exploratory (rather than confirmatory) factor analysis in four Brazilian papers resulted in the “destruction of theory”. These findings suggest that national research have been using exploratory factor analysis in a questionable way; in this sense we propose scholars discuss this topic in order to disseminate the good practices.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050114856&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x3391-16; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2018000200384&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/gp/v25n2/0104-530X-gp-0104-530X3391-16.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2018000200384&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-530X2018000200384&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2018000200384; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-530X2018000200384; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2017005016106&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-530X2017005016106&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2017005016106; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-530X2017005016106; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x3391-16; https://www.scielo.br/j/gp/a/gJjWDhbDKKPfphXJLW4FGNz/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know