Factors associated with the perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity in liver cirrhosis
Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira, ISSN: 1806-9282, Vol: 67, Issue: 2, Page: 271-276
2021
- 5Citations
- 105Usage
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef1
- Usage105
- Full Text Views97
- 97
- Abstract Views8
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with the perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity (PA) in subjects with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: This cross-sectional study assessed 102 outpatients with liver cirrhosis regarding the clinical and sociodemographic profile and the perceived benefits and barriers to PA by the Exercise Benefits and Barriers Scale and muscle strength. A Generalized Step-Forward linear regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated. RESULTS: The participants were 59 }10 years and 60.8% were men. Around 29.4% had ascites decompensation. Perceived benefits and barriers were associated with the presence of ascites (95%CI -0.079 - 0.03; p=0.06 and 95%CI 0.003 - 0.217; p=0.045, respectively). In the group with ascites, both benefits and barriers were associated with muscle strength. In the group without ascites, benefits were associated with cardiovascular risks and no association was observed with barriers to physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity are associated with intrinsic factors such as the presence of ascites and cardiovascular risk in individuals with liver cirrhosis. The results of this study highlight key elements that must be considered for increasing physical activity in this population.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113332241&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.67.02.20200692; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406252; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000300271&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000300271&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-42302021000300271&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021000300271; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-42302021000300271; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.67.02.20200692; https://www.scielo.br/j/ramb/a/gBSmLfS9Vm4ZkpwXrLQyQDR/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know