Digitizing care: Women and new codingsfor hacker ethics
Cadernos Pagu, ISSN: 0104-8333, Vol: 2020, Issue: 59, Page: 1-32
2020
- 1Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Based on a mapping of actions by feminist groups to enhance digital security, called "digital care", we analyze strategies that arise in response to algorithmic opacities and injustices, the lack of diversity in technological spaces and growing gender-based violence in digital environments. We discuss an aspect of this hacktivism (by those who call themselves hackfeminists), that of digital care, considering the perspective of the feminist ethics of care (Gilligan, 2013; Hirata and Debert, 2016), comparing this with the principles of hacker ethics (Levy, 1994; Himanen, 2001).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85099751004&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/18094449202000590005; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-83332020000200214&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cpa/n59/1809-4449-cpa-59-e205905.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-83332020000200214&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-83332020000200214&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-83332020000200214; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-83332020000200214; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/18094449202000590005; https://www.scielo.br/j/cpa/a/MFbYB5fbP9XMr9pWD78Qm9L/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know