Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) Portuguese version used to identify violence within couples.
Cadernos de saúde pública / Ministério da Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, ISSN: 0102-311X, Vol: 18, Issue: 3, Page: 783-796
2002
- 60Citations
- 46,602Usage
- 37Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Following a previous evaluation of concept, item and semantic equivalences, this paper assesses the measurement equivalence between a Portuguese version of Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) and the original instrument conceived in English. The CTS2 has been widely used to tap violence between couples. An intra-observer reliability evaluation involved 165 replications carried out within a 24-48 hour period. Kappa point-estimates were above 0.75 for all scales except sexual coercion. The analysis of internal consistency concerned 768 subjects with complete sets of items. Kuder-Richardson-20 estimates ranged from 0.65 to 0.86. Results were similar to those found in the original instrument in English for the negotiation, psychological aggression and physical violence scales, yet not so for the sexual coercion and injury scales. Factor analysis identified factors with a recognizable correspondence to the underlying dimensions, although a few inconsistencies were detected. For the assessment of construct validity (n = 528) associations between the instrument's scales were evaluated, as well as the relationships between violence and putative underlying dimensions. Overall, the findings suggest that the version can be used in the Brazilian context, although further investigation should be carried out to unveil some important remaining issues.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0036579745&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2002000300022; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12048599; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2002000300022&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/csp/v18n3/9306.pdf; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2002000300022&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2002000300022&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2002000300022; http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2002000300022; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2002000300022&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2002000300022; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0102-311X2002000300022; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2002000300022; https://www.scielo.br/j/csp/a/PFvDwbktjcZZvhd4LhZHf4P/?lang=en
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know