Mapping the margins of women’s football in Brazil: an intersectional gaze at the experiences and barriers to practicing this sport
Revista Brasileira de Ciencias do Esporte, ISSN: 2179-3255, Vol: 46
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
The objective of this article was to analyze, in an intersectional way, the profile and experience of women’s participation in football in Brazil. We carried out a comparative analysis between women, based on data from the 2015 PNAD (IBGE, 2017). The data were treated with descriptive statistics. It is precisely black, poor, young, less educated women who engage in football, which contrasts with the opposite profile who engages in physical activities. The experience of these women is marked by a competitive emphasis, in public or free spaces for participatory football practice. These results highlight the importance of observing how social divides hinder access to football and public policies to democratize it.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85212767427&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/rbce.46.e20240061; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-32892024000100608&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-32892024000100608&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0101-32892024000100608&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-32892024000100608; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0101-32892024000100608; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/rbce.46.e20240061; https://www.scielo.br/j/rbce/a/8HQBmK9xgQvxbw8frgpNQ6k/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know