Moral economies of childhood care. Foster care policy and biological families
Horizontes Antropologicos, ISSN: 0104-7183, Vol: 27, Issue: 61, Page: 227-256
2021
- 1Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this article, we analyze the principle characteristics of the “foster care” programs, with the aim of problematizing the modes in which policies participate in the configuration of family affections and emotions and in the moral, gender-based and class-based redistribution of the responsibility for children. Using data from an investigation on state and non-governmental programs developed in Argentina, we aim to problematize the assumptions about care interwoven in these programs, notions about maternity, paternity and childhood privileged and also how those notions connect to the forms of social organization of care and the feelings about childhood that are deployed by the working class sectors. As such, these programs make up a relevant subject to the extent that they allow us to observes the processes of redefinition of the relationships between the state, marketplace and families as well as of the production of exclusions and gender hierarchies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122235211&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-71832021000300008; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-71832021000300227&tlng=es; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-71832021000300227&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-71832021000300227&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-71832021000300227; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0104-71832021000300227; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-71832021000300008; https://www.scielo.br/j/ha/a/tyBQcbscYw8nr99zW5hKrhp/?lang=es
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know