FLORAL ECOLOGY OF PUYA CTENORHYNCHA (BROMELIACEAE) AN ENDEMIC PLANT OF BOLIVIA
Botanical Sciences, ISSN: 2007-4476, Vol: 102, Issue: 1, Page: 68-82
2024
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
Background: The terrestrial bromeliad Puya ctenorhyncha is a near-threatened endemic species that grows between 2,500-4,050 m asl. Hypotheses: Hummingbirds are the most important visitors of this plant given its morphological and floral traits. Study site: The study was carried out along the “Death Road”, located in the Yungas montane cloud forest, La Paz, Bolivia. Methods: We monitored an average of 216 individuals monthly for two years (2018-2019). Besides we conducted direct observations of focal plants to quantify the visits of animals. Results: The reproductive season lasted from April to August in the first year and from May to June in the second. The mean nectar volume was 8.09 ± 1.59 μL per flower and its composition included fructose, glucose, and 86 % of water. With 341 hours of observations, we determined that Coeligena torquata (Trochilidae) is the main visitor and putative pollinator, followed by C. violifer. Males of both species were more frequent visitors than females. Coeligena torquata showed the highest activity during the afternoon while C. violifer was more active in the morning. Conclusions: Floral phenology seems to be annual and unimodal. Although the main pollinators seem to be hummingbirds, the nectar concentration and composition is more similar to bromeliad species of other genera which are pollinated by bats or passerine birds. It is important to evaluate, in future studies, the dependence of both hummingbirds and their behavioural response towards the plant.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85183423669&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.17129/botsci.3393; https://botanicalsciences.com.mx/index.php/botanicalSciences/article/view/3393; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-42982024000100068&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2007-42982024000100068&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-42982024000100068; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2007-42982024000100068; https://dx.doi.org/10.17129/botsci.3393
Botanical Sciences, Sociedad Botanica de Mexico, AC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know