Recognition and Social Freedom in the Thought of Axel Honneth
Revista Guillermo de Ockham, ISSN: 2256-3202, Vol: 21, Issue: 1, Page: 289-306
2023
- 2Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper undertakes an analysis of Honneth’s concept of social freedom, which has gained relevance for the understanding of freedom in contemporary political philosophy. The moral grammar of recognition is analyzed as the theoretical foundation for any reflection on freedom. The author then revises Honnet’s critique of the ideas of negative and reflexive freedom as a resource for the development of social freedom, which leads in turn to a contrast between the concept of social freedom and other relevant theoretical proposals in contemporary political philosophy. The paper concludes with an assessment of the meaning of social freedom and its contribution to the contemporary understanding of freedom and social justice showing the limits of this proposal Honneth’s.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150886771&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.21500/22563202.5602; https://www.revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/GuillermoOckham/article/view/5602; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-192X2023000100289&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1794-192X2023000100289&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-192X2023000100289; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1794-192X2023000100289; https://dx.doi.org/10.21500/22563202.5602
Universidad de San Buenaventura
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know