Criminal justice, due process and the rule of law in Mexico
Mexican Law Review, ISSN: 2448-5306, Vol: 11, Issue: 2, Page: 147-171
2019
- 1Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
The criminal justice process should not involve obtaining the truth at any price. This article discusses how Mexico has adopted exceptional regulations which violate due process considerations and create a problematic breach of the rule of law. We argue that, at a time when Mexican society suffers the consequences of organized crime, the Constitution provides for two types of regulations: one protecting human rights, which are the foundation of the rule of law; and another which infringes on the individual rights of those suspected of having participated in organized criminal activity. We examine mechanisms such as preventive detention and preventive imprisonment and analyze their treatment under Mexican law as well as in international agreements. We explore whether or not the fight against criminality and the prosecution of criminals “by any means necessary” is more important that the protection of the human rights of those suspected of illegal activity. We conclude by suggesting that the response to criminality should not require limitations on the constitutional freedoms of citizens.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117349146&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2019.1.13131; https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/13131; https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/viewFile/13131/14696; https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/viewFile/13131/14612; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-05782019000100147&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1870-05782019000100147&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-05782019000100147; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1870-05782019000100147; https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2019.1.13131
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know