Excision and Annexation of States. The Case of the Republic of Texas (1836-1845)
Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, ISSN: 2448-7872, Vol: 23, Page: 425-462
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
About the Republic of Texas in this essay a study is made on the legal theoretical framework of the succession and creation of new States, both in the international law of the 19th century and in the international law of our time. In the 19th century, secession was fundamentally a matter of fact. And the definitive guarantee was the approval of the international community, mainly of the great powers. In time present it is impossible to admit secession or annexation when a third State intervenes or when this intervention is carried out through military force. For the secession and annexation of States to be valid, it must be in compliance with international legality, which highlights the acceptance of the predecessor State, compliance with the principle of territorial integrity, except in cases where that State violates the rights of an oppressed population, and the full guarantee of human rights and humanitarian law is also claimed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159277866&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487872e.2023.23.17905; https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derecho-internacional/article/view/17905; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-46542023000100425&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1870-46542023000100425&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-46542023000100425; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1870-46542023000100425; https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487872e.2023.23.17905
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know