ARP Case Report nº 25: What is your diagnosis?
Acta Radiológica Portuguesa, ISSN: 2183-1351, Vol: 34, Issue: 1, Page: 17-17
2022
- 4Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage4
- Full Text Views4
Case Description
A 22-year-old female, previously healthy, without alcohol or smoking habits, was referred to our hospital after an emergency appendectomy in October 2019 at Centro Hospitalar da Cova da Beira (CHCB). During appendectomy, surgeons found a retroperitoneal mass. There was no previous knowledge of this retroperitoneal mass, and the patient had never had any abdominal symptoms before. Abdominal computed tomography was initially performed to better characterize the mass, followed by magnetic resonance. What is the most probable diagnosis?
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-13512022000100017&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2183-13512022000100017&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-13512022000100017; http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2183-13512022000100017; http://dx.doi.org/10.25748/arp.27066; https://revistas.rcaap.pt/actaradiologica/article/view/27066; https://dx.doi.org/10.25748/arp.27066
Sociedade Portuguesa de Radiologia e Medicina Nuclear
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know