Participatory designs in the collaborative i-doc: A model of analysis and an evaluation
Revista de Comunicacion, ISSN: 2227-1465, Vol: 19, Issue: 2, Page: 47-60
2020
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The interactive documentary field has a collaborative dimension since its beginning. This research proposes a model for the analysis of the participation of online communities within interactive documentary, developed on the basis of the previous scientific literature on this topic. Then, analysed case studies have shown the diversity of forms regarding contribution from online communities. On the basis of the different trends observed, five participative designs with different intensities and purposes have been described. Finally, the model has been applied to each design for its evaluation, allowing us to conclude that a significant participation would have to combine several of these designs considering the articulation of participant communities around documentary as well as its contribution to documentary meaning.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85091923670&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.26441/rc19.2-2020-a3; https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1938; http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1684-09332020000200047&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1684-09332020000200047&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1684-09332020000200047; http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1684-09332020000200047; https://dx.doi.org/10.26441/rc19.2-2020-a3
Universidad de Piura
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know