Dilemas morales: ¿Pueden evaluar la teoría utilitarista?
Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social, ISSN: 1870-0063, Vol: 20, Issue: 51, Page: 413-437
2023
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Resumen Deontología y utilitarismo, actuar por el deber según determinados principios, y maximizar la felicidad para la mayoría, respectivamente, se evalúan mediante dilemas (por ejemplo, ¿se debe sacrificar una persona para salvar a cinco?). Se ha cuestionado si las respuestas a estos dilemas reflejan dichas posturas morales. El presente estudio analizó si la aceptación del daño refleja una postura utilitarista. Revisamos estudios que relacionaban la respuesta a los dilemas con indicadores del utilitarismo según cinco criterios que establecimos. Concluimos que las respuestas reflejaron utilitarismo según algunos de los criterios, pero se requieren análisis de mayor validez que incluyan las variables que afectan las respuestas a los dilemas. Propusimos condiciones para evaluar si las respuestas reflejan el utilitarismo en futuros estudios.
Bibliographic Details
https://187.251.123.76/index.php/andamios/article/view/1013; http://dx.doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v20i51.1013; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-00632023000100413&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1870-00632023000100413&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-00632023000100413; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1870-00632023000100413
Universidad Autonoma de la Ciudad de Mexico
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know