Correlation between Myocardial Velocity Measured using Tissue Doppler Imaging in the Left Ventricular Lead-Implanted Segment and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Clinics, ISSN: 1807-5932, Vol: 74, Page: e1077
2019
- 2Citations
- 268Usage
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study investigated whether tissue Doppler imaging parameters, especially the peak systolic velocity of the left ventricular lead-implanted segment (Ss), affect cardiac resynchronization therapy response. In this case-control study, 110 enrolled patients were divided into cases (responder group, n=65) and controls (nonresponder group, n=45) based on whether their left ventricular end-systolic volume was reduced by ≥15% at 6 months after surgery. Preoperative clinical and echocardiographic data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the factors affecting the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy, and receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to evaluate their diagnostic values. The proportion of patients with left bundle branch block in the case group was higher than that in the control group. The control group showed a higher left atrial volume index, E/A ratio and E/Em ratio but lower Ss than that of the case group. A multivariate regression analysis showed that left bundle branch block, Ss, and an E/Em ratio>14 were independent risk factors affecting the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Ss=4.1 cm/s was the best diagnostic threshold according to the receiver operating characteristic curve. Ss is an important factor affecting the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Patients with heart failure associated with Ss<4.1 cm/s have a higher risk of nonresponse.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593222007037; http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e1077; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85073049104&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31596338; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1807593222007037; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322019000100278&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1807-59322019000100278&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322019000100278; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1807-59322019000100278; https://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2019/e1077; https://chooser.crossref.org/?doi=10.6061%2Fclinics%2F2019%2Fe1077
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know