Endogeneity in panel data regressions: Methodological guidance for corporate finance researchers
Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, ISSN: 1983-0807, Vol: 22, Issue: Special Issue, Page: 437-461
2020
- 61Citations
- 7,897Usage
- 147Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Purpose – To describe the use of specific lags (and/or temporal differences) of the original regressors as instrumental variables in a succinct and practical way, showing, by means of a theoretical discussion illustrated by an original simulation exercise, how combining these with adequate modeling of firm and time fixed effects can address not only the dynamic endogeneity problem, but also those derived from the presence of omitted variables, measurement errors, and simultaneity between dependent and independent variables. Design/methodology/approach – Monte Carlo simulation Findings – The traditional OLS, RE, and FE estimators may be inconsistent in the presence of endogeneity problems that are quite plausible in the context of corporate finance. On the other hand, the estimation methods for panel data based on GMM that use assumptions of sequential exogeneity of the regressors present alternatives that are capable of effectively overcoming all the problems listed (provided these assumptions are valid) even if the researcher does not have good instrumental variables that are external to the model Originality/value –The paper discusses and illustrates a greater number of endogeneity problems, showing how they are addressed by different estimators for panel data, using less technical and more accessible language for researchers not yet initiated in the intricacies of estimating dynamic models for panel data.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085081240&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i0.4059; https://rbgn.fecap.br/RBGN/article/view/4059/pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-48922020000500437&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1806-48922020000500437&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-48922020000500437; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1806-48922020000500437; https://dx.doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i0.4059
FECAP Fundacao Escola de Comercio Alvares
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know