Internet Nondiscrimination Principles: Commercial Ethics for Carriers and Search Engines

Citation data:

SSRN Electronic Journal

Publication Year:
2008
Usage 9598
Abstract Views 8978
Downloads 620
Captures 33
Readers 23
Exports-Saves 10
Mentions 2
Blog Mentions 1
News Mentions 1
Social Media 7
Tweets 4
Shares, Likes & Comments 3
Ratings
SSRN
SSRN Id:
1134159
DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.1134159
Author(s):
Frank A. Pasquale
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
search engine; google; telecommunications; common carrier; federal communications commission; law and economics; regulation
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
Most Recent Blog Mention
Most Recent News Mention
article description
Unaccountable power at any layer of online life can stifle innovation elsewhere. Dominant search engines rightly worry that carriers will use their control of the physical layer of internet infrastructure to pick winners among content and application providers. Though they advocate net neutrality, they have been much less quick to recognize the threat to openness and fair play their own practices may pose. Just as dominant search engines fear an unfairly tiered online world, they should be required to provide access to their archives and indices in a nondiscriminatory manner. If dominant search engines want carriers to disclose their traffic management tactics, they should submit to regulation that bans stealth marketing and reliably verifies the absence of the practice. Finally, search engines' concern about the applications and content disadvantaged by carrier fast-tracking should lead them to provide annotation remedies to indexed sites whose marks have been unfairly occluded by the search process. Fair competition online demands common commercial ethics for both dominant search engines and dominant carriers.