Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. v. City of Houston: Has the Fifth Circuit Barred the use of a § 1983 Claim to Enforce Section 253 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996

Citation data:

Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (DJCL), Vol. 34, No. 2, 2009

Publication Year:
2009
Usage 508
Abstract Views 487
Downloads 21
Captures 1
Exports-Saves 1
SSRN Id:
1437775
Author(s):
Christopher Costello
Tags:
Delaware; Journal; Corporate; Law; Telecommunications Act; 1983; southwestern bell; gonzaga; houston; 253
paper description
This comment examines the recent line of federal circuit court of appeals cases that unanimously bar telecommunications companies from enforcing section 253 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act) through suits brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It begins by analyzing the cases preceding these holdings that seemed to clear the way for § 1983 suits in this context. It continues by explaining how a controversial United States Supreme Court decision, Gonzaga University v. Doe, steered courts away from finding a private right of action for telecommunications service providers in the Act. The comment goes on to describe how the Fifth Circuit's decision in Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. v. City of Houston has failed to systematically preclude § 1983 claims in this context and how an undecided circuit could be convinced to allow them. Finally, it concludes by arguing that public policy should prevent telecommunications providers from bringing § 1983 claims against state governments and recommends that Congress amend the Act accordingly.