Using Insurance Law and Policy to Interpret the Tax Code’s Loss and Medical Expense Provisions

Citation data:

Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 26, p. 309, 2007

Publication Year:
2007
Usage 653
Abstract Views 611
Downloads 42
SSRN Id:
1778191
Author(s):
Andrew Blair-Stanek
Tags:
tax; taxation; insurance; deductions; casualty loss; medical expense
paper description
Prior scholarship recognized that I.R.C. § 165 (allowing a deduction for casualty losses) and I.R.C. § 165 (authorizing a deduction for medical expenses) are a free partial insurance scheme, providing tax benefits that partially offset the losses or medical expenses. Courts have long wrestled with determining eligibility for these deductions. This Note proposes that courts should look to the well-developed body of insurance case law to interpret eligibility for these deductions. It further proposed that the government, which effectively acts as an insurer via these deductions, could raise additional revenue using subrogation, which traditional insurers have long used to partially recoup payouts.