The Privacy Policymaking of State Attorneys General

Citation data:

92 Notre Dame Law Review 747 (2016)

Publication Year:
2016
Usage 7249
Abstract Views 6362
Downloads 887
Captures 2
Readers 2
Mentions 3
Blog Mentions 2
References 1
Social Media 60
Tweets 60
Ratings
SSRN
SSRN Id:
2733297
Author(s):
Danielle Keats Citron
Tags:
privacy; bankruptcy; transparency; data breach; consumer protection; financial privacy; data security; UDAP
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
Most Recent Blog Mention
paper description
Accounts of privacy law have focused on legislation, federal agencies, and the self-regulation of privacy professionals. Crucial agents of regulatory change, however, have been ignored: the state attorneys general. This article is the first in-depth study of the privacy norm entrepreneurship of state attorneys general. Because so little has been written about this phenomenon, I engaged with primary sources — first interviewing state attorneys general and current and former career staff, and then examining documentary evidence received through FOIA requests submitted to AG offices around the country. Much as Justice Louis Brandeis imagined states as laboratories of the law, offices of state attorneys general have been laboratories of privacy enforcement. State attorneys general have been nimble privacy enforcement pioneers where federal agencies have been more conservative or constrained by politics. Their local knowledge, specialization, multi-state coordination, and broad legal authority have allowed them to experiment in ways that federal agencies cannot. These characteristics have enabled them to establish baseline fair information protections; expand the frontiers of privacy law to cover sexual intimacy and youth; and pursue enforcement actions that have harmonized privacy policy. Although certain systemic practices enhance AG privacy policy making, others blunt its impact, including an over reliance on informal agreements that lack law’s influence and a reluctance to issue closing letters identifying data practices that comply with the law. This article offers ways state attorneys general can function more effectively through informal and formal proceedings. It addresses concerns about the potential pile-up of enforcement activity, federal preemption, and the dormant Commerce Clause. It urges state enforcers to act more boldly in the face of certain shadowy data practices.