Report on Digitalisation in Company Law
SSRN, ISSN: 1556-5068
2017
- 2,802Usage
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
On 26 January 2015, the European Commission requested the Informal Company Law Expert Group (ICLEG) to consider the issue of digitalisation of company law and two members, Vanessa Knapp and Jesper Lau Hansen, were charged with producing a response on behalf of the Group. The report begins with some general observations on whether there is a need for digitalisation in the company law area, what the current issues are, the current situation and initiatives that have already been taken, what might be achieved by EU intervention in these issues and some areas outside company law which are relevant to the issue. It then presents various recommendations relating to digitalisation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117680282&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2893701; http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2893701; https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2893701; https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2893701; https://ssrn.com/abstract=2893701
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know