Salience and the Government Provision of Public Goods

Citation data:

SSRN Electronic Journal

Publication Year:
2018
Usage 257
Abstract Views 227
Downloads 30
Captures 1
Readers 1
Mentions 5
News Mentions 4
Blog Mentions 1
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
SSRN Id:
3173855
DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.3173855
Author(s):
Matthew Wibbenmeyer; Sarah Anderson; Andrew Plantinga
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
behavioral economics; public goods; salience; risk; public land management
Most Recent Blog Mention
Most Recent News Mention
article description
This paper examines the consequences of salience for the government provision of public goods. Salience is a common behavioral bias whereby people’s attention is drawn to salient features of a decision problem, leading them to overweight prominent information in subsequent judgments. We analyze the case in which the public’s demand for the good is distorted by salient events, and explore how salience influences public good allocation and efficiency. Theoretical predictions regarding public good allocation depend on the magnitude of the change in payoffs and the extent of salience effects. We test whether salience increases allocation of government projects to reduce wildfire severity near wildland-adjacent communities. Even though the occurrence of a wildfire reduces the severity of future fires in the same area, it may increase the likelihood that fuels management projects are placed nearby if wildfire events strongly increase the salience of losses under future fires. We find evidence that the salience effects increase the likelihood of fuels management projects and use robustness checks to eliminate competing explanations for our results. Our salience framework may also offer insights into government responses to terrorism, natural disasters, disease outbreaks, and environmental catastrophes.